Star Trek: Prelude to Axanar

If you know me, you’re aware that I’m a fan of the original Star Trek series. Shatner, Nimoy, the whole gang. I grew up with it, and it made me a lifelong fan of science fiction.

If you’ve read my prior blog post about Trek (My Post is Here) you know how I feel about the various incarnations of Trek that were produced after 1969. In summary, I was disappointed. To put it mildly.

Allow me to discuss Axanar.

Axanar was to be another Star Trek fan film. You may not be aware of the decent number of fan films you can watch for free online, but there are quite a few. They’re a labor of love, and usually seem to be set in the era of the original 60’s series. As consumer tech has become readily available, the quality of these shows has gone up. Several Trek actors have participated, happy to please their fans. Professional writers have contributed.

Axanar was the best of these. They created a twenty-minute proof-of-concept video and posted it to Youtube. They proposed a two-hour movie, and opened the project to fan funding. The fans contributed a million dollars.

And would you like to know why? Let me tell you why. Axanar was far, far superior to anything that the studios have created in years. And on an incredibly frugal budget. The writing was great. The performances were great. Effects, sets, props, costumes, make-up, were all great. And the most important thing? They managed to create the actual Star Trek vibe, and respect the established canon. And in doing all this, they made the studio look really, really bad.

Enter CBS and Paramount. Boom.

The Big Boys stepped in. They specifically targeted Axanar, although they put the kibosh on all of the fan films, including those by James Cawley (who ended up turning his sets into a tourist attraction so fans can visit the Enterprise interior).

Well, it was just announced that a compromise of sorts has been reached. CBS has this thing called Star Trek Shorts, fifteen-minute vignettes that they run on their All-Access pay channel. They’ve reached an agreement that will allow the Axanar project to become a two-part short, for a total run-time of thirty minutes. So instead of a two-hour feature, they will continue the “mock documentary” format of their original twenty-minute Youtube proof-of-concept film. At least they get to finish out the story they’d planned.

But the whole thing begs the question of why the suits don’t give us Star Trek. Why do they have to change everything? Those loyal fans are the ones who’ve made Trek a viable franchise for over fifty years. Why throw the dice and gamble with their beloved setting? Does it truly make sense to alienate (pun intended) the consumers who want to buy your product? It’s a damned shame.

But in any case, we have Axanar to look forward to. In abbreviated format, but hopefully this will generate attention for the kind of old-school Trek that is loved by so many fans.

Prelude to Axanar Proof-of-Concept short on Youtube:

CBS/Paramount Halt Axanar Production:

Axanar’s Recent Website Update:

10 thoughts on “Star Trek: Prelude to Axanar

  1. I neglected to mention that I’m involved in an online Star Trek role-playing game, using the FASA rules set. If you’re interested in joining, please let me know!


      1. A little time with a web-browser indicates that the suit was over copyright infringement. “Profit” doesn’t appear to enter into it. But it was settled, and my post is simply fan-gushing about wanting to see the Axanar project finished. Why some folks aren’t happy with the Axanar team is really outside the scope of my post. Don’t watch it if you don’t want to. But please don’t bring another topic onto my board. Thanks.


    1. You can see the Prelude to Axanar proof-of-concept video via the Youtube link I posted above. That’s all there is to see at the moment. If you want to download it from Youtube there are certainly ways…


    1. Dammit Tygger, I’m a fan, not a lawyer! I read an article on Fan Film Factor about it, but that’s as far as my interest can be stretched. Why, what are your thoughts on the matter?


      1. Haha Finally I decide to get back on here and read, for a change. Not sure if it is still relevant, but I read them over (back when this was all written) and they seemed quite detailed to keep the creation of content intentionally short and unconnected. Basically, I am reading it as “don’t make anything that could compete or take popularity away from official content.” I will have to go back and read over any changes they have made. In these fluid times, who knows where they would land on topics.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.